🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils is set to be cut by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to submit the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their local governments to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are able to create other types of wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.